Reference in Realistic Prose: Ethnolinguistic Aspect.

Authors

  • V. Burak Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка (м. Львів, Україна)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2018.35.12

Keywords:

communicative ethnolinguistics, reference, interpretive semantics, conventionality, prototype, stereotype

Abstract

The artistic text is interesting object in ethnolinguistics studies for several reasons: 1) it is created by the linguistic personality, which is the competent bearer of culture; 2) it is addressed to a wide range of readers who can decrypt messages because they have a partly shared cognitive base with the author; 3) becoming an object of publicity, it forms the public consciousness, acts as a source of a priori knowledge (preceding individual experience). The texts of a realistic style reflect the stereotypical image of the world as much as possible. Consequently, this material can be used to reconstruct the linguistic and conceptual picture of the world of different cultures. Through the creation of possible worlds and the application of various tactics of speech influence implements the utilitarian function of literature and is embodied communicative goals of the author. Therefore, within the limits of ethnolinguistic research it is expedient to carry out an analysis of the verbalization of both conventional and occasional meanings.

Author Biography

V. Burak, Львівський національний університет імені Івана Франка (м. Львів, Україна)

аспірант кафедри загального мовознавства філологічного факультету

References

Bartmin'skij, Ezhy. Stil kak znak. Deryvatsyonnaia kontseptsyia stylia. Yazykovoj obraz mira: ocherki po e'tnolingvistike (Language image of world). Perevod s pol'skogo. Indrik. Moskva. (2005): 320–342. Print.

Batsevych, Florij. “Tekst jak znak: problemy ikonichnosti” (Text as a sign: problems of iconicity). Teoretychna i dydaktychna filolohia. Seria «Filolohia» (Theoretic and didactic philology. Serie «Filology» ). Vyp. 25. (2017): 37– 44. Print.

Batsevych, Florij. Slovnyk terminiv mizhkulturnoi komunikatsii. (2007): 205. Print.

Brazghovskaia, Elena. Referentsyia i otobrazhenie (ot fylosofii yazyka k fylosofii teksta). Perm. (2006): 192.

Czachur, Waldemar. “Dyskursywny obraz świata: kilka refleksji”. Tekst i dyskurs 4 (2011): 79–97. Print.

Davis, Wayne. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. (1996): 882. Print.

Eko Umberto. Rol chitatelia. Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta. (The role of the reader. Studies on semiotics of culture). Sankt-Peterburg. (2007): 491. Print.

Frehe, Hotlob. “Smysl i denotat” (“Meaning and denotate”). Semiotika i informatika sbornik nauchnykh statei «Iazyki russkoi kultury» (Semiotics and Informatics. Collection of scientific articles “Languages of Russian culture”): Vyp. 35. Moskva. (1977): 352–379. Print.

Grice, Herbert Paul. “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature”. P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. Academic Press. New York. (1989): 183–198. Print.

Houlbrooke, Ralph. The English Family. Themes in British Social History. Personal education. New York. (2013): 265.

Hreimas, Alhydras and Kurte, Zhozef. Semyotyka. Obyasnitelnyi slovar teorii yazyka (Semiotics. Explanatory Dictionary of Language Theory). Raduha. Moskva. (1983): 485–550. Print.

Hromiak, Roman and Kovaliv, Yurii. Literaturoznavchyi slovnyk-dovidnyk (Literary dictionary-reference book). «Akademiya». Kyiv. (2007): 752. Print.

Hudz, Nina. “Henezys poniattia «dyskurs» u suchasnii linhvistytsi” (“Genesis of the concept of "discourse" in modern linguistics”). Naukovi zapysky KDPU im. V. Vynnychenka. Seriia: Filolohichni nauky (movoznavstvo) (Scientific notes of KDPU them. V. Vynnychenko. Series: Philology (Linguistics)): U 2 ch. 442–455. Print.

Kędra-Kardela, Anna. Reading as interpretation. Towards a Narrative Theory of Fictional World Construction. Wydawnictwo UMCS. Lublin. (2010): 181. Print.

Khintikka, Yaakko. Lohiko-epistemolohicheskiye issledovaniya (Logical-epistemological studies). Prohress. Moskva (1980): 448. Print.

Kiklewicz, Aleksander. “Pragmatyczne aspekty językowego obrazu świata“. Język. Komunikacja. Wiedza. Mińsk. (2006): 319–339. Print.

Kripke, Sol. “A Problem in the Theory of Reference: the Linguistic Division of Labor and the Social Character of Naming”. Philosophy and Culture (Proceedings of the XVIIth World Congress of Philosophy). Editions Montmorency. Montreal. (1986): 241–247. Print.

Lotman, Yuryi. Struktura khudozhestvennoho teksta (Structure of artistic text). Мoskva. (1970): 384. Print.

Moroń, Ewelina and Pawlikowska, Aleksandra. “Dyskursywny obraz Wrocławia w mediach”. WTN Rozprawy komisji językowej XXXVII. (2008): 105–118. Print.

Mykhailov, Nykolai. Teoryia khudozhestvennoho teksta (The theory of artistic text). Moskva. (2006): 218. Print.

Nowak, Paweł and Tokarski, Ryszard. “Medialna wizja świata a kreatywność językowa”. Kreowanie światów w języku mediów. Lublin. 9–35. Print.

Rosch, Eleonora. “Cognitive reference points”. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 532–547. Print.

Searle, John. “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse”. Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. (1979) 58–75. Print.

Selyvanova, Elena. Osnovы lynhvystycheskoi teoryy teksta y kommunykatsyy: Monohrafycheskoe uchebnoe posobye. (Fundamentals of the Linguistic Theory of Text and Communication: Monographic Study Manual). Kiev (2002): 336. Print.

Sepyr, Edvard. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu i kulturolohii (Selected works on linguistics and cultural studies). Moskva. (1993): 259–262. Print.

Skubalanka, Teresa. Wiersz Mickiewicza „Te rozkwitłe świeżo drzewa...” wśród konwencji stylistycznych epoki. Język Artystyczny 10. Śląsk. (1996): 53–60. Print.

Stepanov, Yuriy. V mire semiotiki (In the world of semiotics). Moskva. (1983): 5–36. Print.

Tabakowska, Elżbieta. „Natężtnie świadomości”. O związkach poezii z gramatyką. Semantyka tekstu artystycznego pod red. A. Pajdzińskiej i R. Tokarskiego. Cerwona serja, t. 15. Wydawnictwo UMCS. Lublin. (2001): 177–189. Print.

Tiupa, Valerii. Analiz khudozhestvennoho teksta (Analysis of the artistic text): Moskva. (2009): 336. Print.

Van Dijk T. A. “Semantic Discourse Analisys”. Handbook of discourse analysis 2, Copyrigh by Academic Press London. (1985): 103–112. Print.

Vitgenshtain, Liudvyh. Lohyko-fylosofskyi traktat (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus). Мoskva. (1958). Print.

Yermolenko, Serhii. Movne modeliuvannia diisnosti i znakova struktura movnykh odynyts. (Language simulation of reality and the sign structure of linguistic units). Vydavnychyi Dim Dmytra Burahoю Kyiv. (2006): 384. Print.

How to Cite

Burak, V. (2018). Reference in Realistic Prose: Ethnolinguistic Aspect. Linguistic Studies, 93-99. https://doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2018.35.12

Issue

Section

SECTION V. Issues of Text Linguistics, Discourse Studies, and Cognitive Linguistics