Approaches to Revealing the Conceptual Content of Literary Texts (Cognitive-discursive and Lingual-aesthetic Perspective).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2019.38.11Schlagworte:
Literary text, discourse, litarery concept, conceptualization, literary/poetic imageAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss approaches and general principles aimed at revealing the conceptual content of literary text proceeding from a) understanding the literary concept as correlation of its cognitivediscursive and lingual-aesthetic manifestations which exist in the inseparable unity and b) the specificity of literary communication that determines the dialogic nature of literary concept emerging as a superposition of cultural, historical, ideological senses in its semantic structure that arose in the result of common creative reflections of the author and the reader. The process of reconstructing author’s conceptual system was based on the poetry of William Wordsworth as the source of illustrative material.Literaturhinweise
Bara Bruno G. Cognitive pragmatics: the mental processes of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010. Print.
Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika (Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics). Moscow: Progress, 1989. Print.
Behta I. “Khudozhniy tekst u sferi novitnih kognityvnyh studiy (Literary text in the light of modern cognitive studies).” Zakarpats'ki philologichni studiyi (Transcarpathian philological studies) 9/1 (2019): 57–63. Print.
Eco U. Otkrytoye proizviedieniye (Opera Aperta). St. Petersburg, 2006. Print.
From Text to Literature. New Analytic and Pragmatic Approaches. Ed. by Stein Haugom Olsen, Anders Pettersson. N.Y: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print.
Gadamer G.-G. Philosophia i literatura (Philosophy and literature). Moskow: Iskusstvo. 1991. Print.
Kaganovs'ka O. M. Tekstovi kontsepty hudozhnioyi prozy (Textual concepts of fiction prose). Kyiv, 2002. Print.
Karasik V. I. Lingvokul'turnaya kontseptologiya (Linguocultural conceptology). Volgograd: Paradigma, 2009. Print.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovyie kliuchi (Language Keys). Moscow: Gnozis, 2009. Print.
Lotman Y. Ob iskustvie. Struktura Khudozhestviennogo teksta (About the art. The structure of literary text). St. Petersburg, 1998 . Web 14 Oct. 2019.
Luchjenbroers J. Cognitive Linguistics Investigations. Across languages, fields and philosophical boundaries. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006. Print.
Nikonova V. G. Tragediyna kartyna svitu u poetytsi Shekspira (tragical picture of the world in Shakespearian poetics). Dnipropetrovsk, 2008. Print.
Romanyshyn N. “Do problem rozmezhuvannia linguokulturnogo ta khudozhniogo kontseptu (To the problem of differentiating of linguocultural and literary concept).” Liudyna. Kompyuter. Komunikatsiya (Human. Computer. Communication), 2017. 101–104. Print.
Selivanova E. A. Osnovy linguistichieskoy teorii teksta i kommuniratsii (Fundamentals of linguisitic theory of text and communication). Kiev Fitotsentr, 2002. Print.
Slyshkin G. G. Ot teksta k simvolu: linguokulturnyie aspekty pretsendentnyh tekstov v soznanii i diskursie (From the text to the symbol: linguocultural aspects of precedent texts in the consciousness and in the discourse). Moscow: Academiya, 2000. Print.
Stepanov Y. S. "V mirie semiotiki (In the world of semiotics)“. Semiotika (Semiotics). Мoscow: Raduga, 1983. Print.
Stepanov Y. S. Frantsuzskaya stilistika (French stylistics). Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2003. Print.
Vinogradov V. V. O tieorii hudozhestvennoi riechi (On the theory of literary language). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1971. Print.
Vorobyova O. “Kontseptologiya v Ukrainie: Obzor problematiki (Conceptology in Ukraine: The review of the problems)”. Linguokontseptologiya: perspektivnyye napravlieniya (Linguo-conceptological studies: perspective direction). Lugansk: IU LNPU, 2013. 10−37. Print.
Zusman V. “Kontsept v sistiemie humanitarnogo znaniya (Concept in the system of humanitarian knowledge)”. Voprosy litieratury (Questions of the literature) 2 (2003): 2–15. Print.
