MIND Value: Semantics, Structure, Pragmatics (on the Material of English, German, Ukrainian and Russian Phraseology).
Klíčová slova:
evaluation, phraseology, phraseological axiological opposition, value, the axiological world‘s imageAbstrakt
The description of the mind value's specificity in the article is performed with the help of the method of parametric analysis of the phraseological unit's semantic structure, proposed by V. Zymin, with the release of the evaluative macro-components, and the basic method ideographic linguistics, the method of thematic fields, that is, via the phraseosemantic fields, phraseosemantic groups (PhSG) and phraseosemantic subgroups (PhSSG), where the value is the phraseosemantic field, within the article's problematics it is mind, and the PhSG is the elements of phraseosemantic axiological opposition, and the PhSSG is interpreted as a set of phraseological units combined by the differential seme, which binds their oppositional relationship of similarity or contrast. The phraseological axiological opposition (PhAO) is understood as a unity of two blocks represented by phraseological units: the first is formed by phrasemes, semantics of which correlates with the values, and the second is made up by phrasemes, semantics of which correlates with non-values.Reference
Alefirenko, Nikolaj. Lingvokul'turologiya: Tsennostno-Smyslovoye Prostranstvo Yazyka (Linguoculturology: the Value-Semantic Space of the Language). Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2010. Print.
Babayeva, Elena. ―Lingvokul'turologicheskiye Kharakteristiki Russkoy i Nemetskoy Aksiologicheskikh Kartin Mira (Linguistic and Cultural Characteristics of Russian and German Axiological Pictures of the World)‘‘. Diss. Volgograd State Pedagogical U, 2004. Abstract. Print.
Batsuren, Renchin. ―Otobrazheniye Universal'nykh i Etnospetsyficheskikh Chert Yazykovoy Kartiny Mira v Frazeologicheskikh Fondakh Angliyskogo, Russkogo i Mongol‘skogo Yazykov (To Display Generic and Ethnospecific Traits of the Language Picture of the World in Phraseological Funds of English, Russian and Mongolian)‘‘. Diss. Saratov N.G. Chernyshevsky state U, 2010. Abstract. Print.
Karasik, Vladimir. Yazykovoy Krug: Lichnost', Kontsepty, Diskurs (Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse). Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. Print.
Krasnobaieva-Chorna, Zhanna. ―Frazemna Aksiolohiya: Katehory`zatsiya i Rivneva Strukturovanist` (Phraseme Axiology: Categorization and Level Structuredness)‘‘. Diss. Odesa I. Mechnikov National U, 2017. Abstract. Print.
Rus-Bryushynina, Iness-Valentina. ―Osobennosti Yazykovoy Kontseptualizatsii Dukhovnykh Tsennostey Sotsiuma: Lingvokul'turnyy i Lingvostranovedcheskiy Aspekty: na Materiale Ispanskogo i Russkogo Yazykov (Features of the Language Conceptualization of the Spiritual Values of Society: Linguocultural and Linguistic-Cultural Aspects: on the Material of Spanish and Russian Languages)‘‘. Diss. Stavropol State U, 2010. Abstract. Print.
Serebrennikova, Yelena. Lingvistika i Aksiologiya: Etnosemiometriya Tsennostnykh Smyslov (Linguistics and Axiology: Ethnosemiometry of Value Meanings). Moscow: Tezaurus, 2011. Print.
Zimin, Valentin. ―Otsenochno-Emotivnaya Ambivalentnost' Frazeologicheskikh Yedinits v Sovremennom Russkom Yazyke (Estimated-Emotional Ambivalence of Phraseological Units in Modern Russian)‘‘. Slovo: Fol'klornoDialektologicheskiy Al'manakh: Yazykoznaniye (Word: Folklore-Dialectological Almanac: Linguistics) 3 (2005): 5–6. Print.
