Pragmatic Potential of the Pronoun It in Texts of Horror Discourse.
Klíčová slova:
horror discourse, text, imaginary world, implicitness, communicative sense, pronoun itAbstrakt
Horror discourse is presented by artistic texts which reveal a specific imaginary world that bases on the communicants’ psychological experience. The key stone of “author – reader” communication in these texts is the communicative sense of fear that finds its step by step realization on different textual and linguistic levels. Subjectivity of text creation and text perception in this communication gives birth to various implicit communicative senses that constitute the final sense of fear. One of the bearers of such implicit communicative senses in the English language is pronoun it. In some texts of the horror discourse it is used to refer to the subject-source of fear to exemplify nonidentifying reference. The conventional senses of it (“inanimate”, “dead”, and “non-human”) are exploited regularly and acquire new, specific only for horrific texts, shades of meaning: thus, we distinguish a combination of communicative senses “fear – doubt” that is possible to elicit due to the lingual expression of the SS by it bearing along with conventional senses new ones – non-identifiability, eternity and undeath.Reference
Batsevich, Florij. Narysy z Lingvistychnoi Pragmatyky (Notes on Linguistic Pragmatics). Lviv: PAIS, 2010. Print.
Brazgovskaya, Eugenia. Referentsija I Otobrazhenije (ot filosofiji jasyka k filosofiji teksta) (Reference and Reflection (from Philosophy of Language to Philosophy of Text). Perm: PermGU, 2006. Print.
Frolova, Olga. Mir, Stojaschij za Tekstom: Referentsialnyje Mehanizmy Poslovitsy, Anekdota, Volshebnoy Skazki I Avtorskogo Povestvovatelnogo Hudozhestevennogo Teksta (The World Behind the Text: Referential Mechanisms of Sayings, Anecdotes, Fairy Tales and Authorial Fictional Texts). Moskva: LKI, 2012. Print.
Ivanyshyn, Natalia. Leksychni Zasoby Formuvannia Impitsitnosti u Dramaturhijnomu Teksti (na materiali ukrainskoji dramy pochatku XX stolittia) (Lexical Means of Forming Implicitness in Drama Texts (on the material of Ukrainian drama of the beginning of the XX century). Diss. U of Ivano-Frnkivsk, 2006. Print.
Nefiodova, Lilia. Kognitivno-Dejatelnostnyj Aspect Implicativnoj Kommunikatsiji (Cognitive-Active Aspect of Implicational Communication). Cheliabinsk: ChelGU, 2001. Print.
Plotnikova, Svetlana. ”Kognitivnyje Printsipy Sozdanija Anomalnogo Hudozhestvennogo Myra (Cognitive Principles of Creating Anomalous Fictional World)”. Problemy Stilistiki I Pragmatiki Vyskazyvanija I Teksta (Problems of Stylistics and Pragmatics of an Utterance and a Text) (1997): 106-114. Print.
Sazonova, Yaroslava. “Modalni mehanizmy stvorenna tekstiv dyskursu zhahiv (Modal Mechanisms of Creating Texts of Horror Discourse)”. Sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní konference VIII. olomoucké symposium ukrajinistů střední a východní Evropy, August 25. – 27.8.2016, Olomouc. Ed. By Alla Arkhanhelska, and Radana Merzova. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackeho, 2016. 326 – 332. Print.
Sazonova, Yaroslava. “Typy referentsii u tekstah dyskursu zhahiv (Types of Reference in the Texts of Horror Discourse)”. Lingvistychni Doslidzhennia (Linguistic Studies). 43 (2016): 208 – 216. Print.