Literary text in aspect of its communicative structure: theoretical perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2023.45.5Keywords:
literary text; communicative structure; sociolinguistic categories of coherence; addresser; addressee; intentionality; informativity; and intertextualityAbstract
The study throws light at text as a structural, semantic, communicative, and paradigmatic unity. The research of text, literary in particular, has lately been carried out with basic focus on its structural and semantic characteristics. To analyze text as a communication system it is reasonable to trace and qualify communicative and sociolinguistic status of its categories.
References
Andrushchenko, Viktoriia O. Zakonomirnosti vyiavu katehoriinoi zvʼiaznosti v horyzontalnii i vertykalnii vnutrishnii khudozhnotekstovii strukturi: avtoref. dys. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.15. 2013. 20 s.
Andrushchenko, Viktoriia O. Typolohiia tekstovoi zviaznosti: Monohrafiia. Dnipropetrovsk: «Litohraf», 2016. 247 s.
Caselli, Tommaso, Sprugnoli, Rachele, Moretti, Giovanni. “Identifying communicative functions in discourse with content types”. Language Resources & Evaluation. № 56, 2022. 417–450. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-021-09554-4
Fairclough, Norman. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge: London and New York, 269 p.
Longacre, Robert E. The Grammar of Discourse (Topics in Language and Linguistics). 2nd ed. Springer, 2013. 379 p.
Radziievska, Tetiana V. Komunikatyvno-prahmatychni aspekty tekstotvorennia: dys. … doktora filol. nauk: 10.02.15. Kyiv, 1999. 359 s.
Raymond, W. Gibbs Jr. Authorial Intentions in Text Understanding. Discourse Processes. Volume 32, Issue 1, 2001. P. 73–80. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15326950DP3201_04?journalCode=hdsp20
Sielivanova, Yeliena A. Osnovy lingvistichieskoy tieorii tieksta i kommunikatsii: monograf. uchieb. posob. K.: TsUL, „Fitosotsiotsientr”, 2002. 336 s.
Selivanova, Olena O. Suchasna linhvistyka: terminolohichna entsyklopediia. Poltava: „Dovkillia-K”, 2006. 716 s.
Tanskanen, Sanna K. Collaborating towards Coherence: Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. University of Turku: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006. 192 p.
Tomusiak, Alina O. “Verbalizatsiia avtorskykh intentsii fihuralno-rytorychnymy syntaksychnymy zasobamy v amerykanskomu khudozhnomu teksti”. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Filolohiia 46. Odesa, 2020. Tom 2. 165–168.
Yeshchenko, Tetiana A. Fenomen khudozhnoho tekstu: komunikatyvnyi, semantychnyi i prahmatychnyi aspekty: monohrafiia / naukovyi redaktor prof. Stepanenko M. I. Lviv: Lvivskyi natsionalnyi medychnyi universytet imeni Danyla Halytskoho, 2021. 470 s.
Zahnitko, Anatolii P. “Hramatyka tekstu: movnosotsiumni katehorii”. Zapysky z ukrainskoho movoznavstva, 29. 2022, 149–164.
Zahnitko, Anatolii P. Linhvistyka tekstu: Teoriia i praktykum. Donetsk: OOO „Yuho-Vostok” Ltd, 2006. 289 s.
Zhurba, S. “«Hra v dialoh»: avtorska intentsiia v ukrainskii prozi 20-kh rokiv XX stolittia”. Filolohichni studii: Naukovyi visnyk Kryvorizkoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu, 20. Kirovohrad, 2019,114–125.
